Skip to main content

Should household be charged for their household waste?


In Australia local councils are charging rates for individual household waste and sewerage systems. Rates are standard for all household under one council but different council may have different rates. The question that comes to my mind is one household may produce 5kg of waste per week vs another who produces 8kg or 10kg of waste per week. Because some households are well aware of GHG emissions, environmental degradation and other climate change related issues therefore they produce less waste by changing their behaviour and actions. Whereas others who are least bothered to worry about such issues or does not care at all therefore they continue to produce waste as much as they can and consume more and more resources. So why those household who produces less waste and cares about the environment should pay the same council rates as others who produces twice the amount of waste? Is that because councils don't have the process on how to measure individual household's waste? or is it the same size bins are problem? or Our councils are not proactively looking for solutions which offers incentives to households to reduce their waste?

Councils in Australia can become smarter in various ways to reduce household waste (recyclable and organic) at source by proactively introducing reduced waste charges for those who do care and waste less through smaller bin than the normal size or may be collecting bi-weekly or offering strata units of only one bin for organic and one bin for recyclable items. Why do people need separate bins in strata settings? Why can’t they just have one bin? Trucks can pick up quicker instead of loading and unloading 10 bins, trucks would have to load and unload only 1 bin; wouldn't that be a quicker way of collecting waste and reduce time, effort and petrol? (not to mention co2 emissions and less labor through efficiency in bin collection). Not only truck driver but those individual household in strata living or even big houses on one street spends tremendous amount of time (if put together) for taking out bin every week and putting it back. The tasks can be shared amongst household if there was only one bin. So much of an opportunity is there for council to introduce such practices by offering incentives to become smarter and charge less, collect less waste and worry less about composting organic waste, separating recyclable items and specially land filling.

Comments

  1. How about an across the board annual community fee that takes the place of fees or taxes for garbage, property tax, school costs, local sales tax, police & fire, etc. Levied on a per head basis. If you are single or old and living alone you pay for one person. If you have eight kids and a wife you pay for 10 people. The world is running out of space and resources this might slow growth donw somewhat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's only imperative that the city councils work out a way with the households so that long-term solution of household waste can be determined. The role of rubbish removal agencies like http://www.everythingrubbish.com.au/ in this regard cannot be gainsaid.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Value of Vultures - What’s a vulture worth? A lot more than you might think.

Illustration by Kelsey King June 4, 2014 — Editor’s note: The following is excerpted from What Has Nature Ever Done For Us? How Money Really Does Grow on Trees   (2013) by Tony Juniper. In the book the author explores the economic value of nature, pointing to examples of natural services that are (or were) provided for free by nature, and which are being removed at our cost.  Juniper argues that in light of this realization we should stop treating natural systems in a destructive manner. Published here with permission from Synergetic Press.   One bright clear morning in April 1993 I was aboard a British Airways 747 that was preparing to land at New Delhi Airport in India. As the aircraft started its final descent from about 1,000 meters, I noticed vultures. Their broad wings, with flight feathers spread out like a span of long fingers, had taken them to the height of the plane. From this vantage point their incredibly sharp vision would enable them to scan t...

Climate Change Policy Response – A Case of China

Climate Change Policy Response – A Case of China Introduction Global climate change and its adverse effects are a common concern of mankind. Ever since the industrial revolution, human activities, especially the massive consumption of energy and resource by developed countries in the process of industrialisation, have increased the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases, produced conspicuous impacts on the natural ecosystems of the earth, and posed severe challenges to the survival and development of human society (National Development and Reform Commission, 2008) . The ultimate goal of the United Nations Framework convention on Climate Change is “stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” Such a level should be achieved within a “time frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened, a...

New research points to risk peak oil presents to business

The sun sets behind an oil well sited in the middle of a soybean field in 2008 near New Haven, Illinois, USA. Photograph: Scott Olson/Getty Images For many years, the most compelling issue driving sustainability efforts among businesses, consumers, governments and activists has been climate change. We are all becoming increasingly concerned with the impacts of rising temperatures and extreme weather events on our supply chains, cities, transportation networks, agricultural industries, and lives. We have become increasingly alarmed about the results of burning too much coal, oil and gas; the consequences of excessive emissions resulting from some of the most useful substances humanity has ever harnessed. We have identified our most important struggle – to maintain economic growth while reducing carbon emissions. Because our concern has been first and foremost the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, we have designed and sporadically implemented economic i...